Student Project Deaccessioning: A curatorial review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24823/Sibbaldia.2020.301Keywords:
Deaccessioning, Living Collection PolicyAbstract
Deaccessioning in collections can be controversial because of the value associated with some taxa and their conservational, historical, educational, display and research significance within the collection. Twenty-one horticultural institutions completed a survey on the protocols for deaccessioning plant material. The resulting data were collated to provide a comparison of the different approaches institutions take towards deaccessioning their collections. This study has identified that conservation and education are the most important factors in managing garden collections. Accession data of high quality is an essential part of managing a collection, but poor accession data should not be a reason to deaccession plants. Space constraints are the primary factor behind the deaccessioning of collections. This paper is a summary of the research project completed by the author for the BSc in Horticulture with Plantsmanship at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE).
References
ALLNUTT, T., NEWTON, A., LARA, A., PREMOLI, A., ARMESTO, J., VERGARA, R. & GARDNER, M. (1999). Genetic variation in Fitzroya cupressoides (alerce), a threatened South American conifer. Molecular Ecology, 8: 975–987.
AMERICAN PUBLIC GARDENS ASSOCIATION (2019). About us. Available online: https://www.publicgardens.org/about-us (accessed November 2019).
BADLEY, C., HILL, D. & WRAY, N. (2004). Inadequate accession data compromises the conservation value of plant collections. Sibbaldia: The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture, 2: 5–21.
BENEDICT, K. (1984). Invitation to a bonfire: reappraisal and deaccessioning of records as collection management tools in an archives – a reply to Leonard Rapport. American Archivist, 47(1): 43–49.
BENNETT, E.S. & SWASEY, J.E. (1996). Perceived stress reduction in urban public gardens. HortTechnology, 6(2): 125–128.
BLACKMORE, S. (2008). Sibbaldia Guest Essay: Keep or compost? Why there must be life after research for living collections. Sibbaldia: The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture, 6: 5–8.
BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (2012). Communities in nature: growing the social role of botanic gardens. Available online: http://www.bgci.org/education/communities_in_nature (accessed November 2019).
BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (2019). BGCI membership. Available online: https://www.bgci.org/membership/our-members (accessed December 2019).
CHRISTIAN, T. (2008). A pilot study for the yew conservation hedge project at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Unpublished BSc thesis, Scottish Agricultural College in conjunction with RBGE and the University of Glasgow.
COLLERAN, K. (2013). RBGE’s carpological collection: a curatorial review. Unpublished BSc thesis, RBGE, SRUC and the University of Glasgow.
CONNELL, J. (2004). The purest of human pleasures: the characteristics and motivations of garden visitors in Great Britain. Tourism Management, 25(2): 229–247.
DOSSMAN, M.S. (2016). Curatorial Notes: An Updated Living Collections Policy at the Arnold Arboretum. Arnoldia, New York.
FLICK, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (4th edn). SAGE, London.
FRANCE, H. (2019). Student Project: A survey of bryophytes and their management in the ferns and fossils house at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Sibbaldia: The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture, 17: 29–49.
FREDIANI, K. (2009). De Hortus Botanicus Amsterdam. Sibbaldia: The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture, 7: 121–138.
GARDNER, M., CHRISTIAN, T., HINCHCLIFFE, W. & CUBEY, R. (2019). Conservation hedges: modern-day arks. Sibbaldia: The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture, 17: 71–100.
GARDNER, M. & THOMAS, P. (1996). The International Conifer Conservation Programme (ICCP). New Plantsman, 7: 174–177.
GLASGOW BOTANIC GARDENS (2016). Curatorial policy for Glasgow Botanic Gardens (internal policy document). Glasgow Botanic Gardens, Glasgow.
GREENE, M. (2006). I’ve deaccessioned and lived to tell about it: Confessions of an unrepentant reappraiser. Archival Issues, 30(1): 7–22.
HOOKER, J. (1844). Icones plantarum 7: Biodiversity Library. Available online: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16153783#page/139/mode/1up (accessed October 2019).
INTERNATIONAL DENDROLOGICAL SOCIETY (N.D.). Berberis x stenophylla. Trees and Shrubs Online. Available online: https://treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/berberis/berberis-x-stenophylla (accessed October 2019).
JOHNSON, N. (2013). Cultivating science and planting beauty: the spaces of display in Cambridge’s botanical gardens. Interdisciplinary Science Review, 31(1): 42–57.
KELLE, U. (2008). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(4): 293–311.
KIM, Y.D., KIM, S. & LANDRUM, L. (2004). Taxonomic and phytogeographic implications from ITS phylogeny in Berberis (Berberidaceae). Journal of Plant Research, 117(3): 175–182.
MAUNDER, M., HIGGENS, S. & CULHAM, A. (2001). The effectiveness of botanic garden collection in supporting plant conservation: a European case study. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10: 383–401.
NORTH CAROLINA BOTANIC GARDEN (2017). Living collection policy (internal policy document).
OXFORD DICTIONARY (2015). Oxford Dictionary of English (3rd edn). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
RAE, D. (1994). Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh acquisition policy (internal policy document).
RAE, D. (1995). Botanic gardens and their live plant collections: present and future roles. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
RAE, D. (2004). Fit for purpose? The value of checking collection statistics. Sibbaldia: The Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture, 2: 61–74.
RAE, D., BAXTER, P., KNOTT, D., MITCHELL, D., PATERSON, D. & UNWIN, B. (2006). Collection Policy for the Living Collection (internal policy document).
RAE, D., CUBEY, R., HUGHES, K., GARDNER, M., THOMPSON, H., INCHES, F. & KNOTT, D. (2012). Catalogue of Plants 2012. RBGE, Edinburgh.
RANDALL, D.M. & FERNANDES, M.F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10: 805–817.
RICHARDS, L. (2005). Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. SAGE, London.
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH (1994). Issue Plan for the Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. RBGE, Edinburgh.
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH (2000–2012). Annual Reports. RBGE, Edinburgh.
SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS (2017). Guidelines for Reappraisal and Deaccessioning. Society of American Archivists, Chicago.
SONDERMAN, R. (1996). Primal fear: deaccessioning collections. Common Ground, 1(2): 26–29.
STAM, D. (1982). Prove all things: hold fast that which is good. Deaccessioning and Research Libraries, 43(1): 5–13.
THOMAS, P. & WATSON, M. (2000). Data Management for Plant Collections: A Handbook of Best Practice. RBGE, Edinburgh.
THREATENED CONIFERS (2019). RBGE. Available online: https://threatenedconifers.rbge.org.uk/conifers/abies-fabri (accessed November 2019).
VECCO, M. & PIAZZAI, M. (2015). Deaccessioning of museum collections: What do we know and where do we stand in Europe? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(2): 221–227.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Please read our Open Access, Copyright and Permissions policies for more information.
