BOURNEA IS NOT SUPPORTED AS SEPARATE FROM OREOCHARIS(GESNERIACEAE)

Authors

  • M. Möller Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2819-0323
  • D.J. Middleton Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-1452
  • S. Ulrich Department of Historical Archaeology, Austrian Archaeological Institute
  • A. Weber Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24823/ejb.2025.2028

Keywords:

Bournea, China, Molecular Phylogeny, Morphology, Oreocharis, Phylogeny, Synonomy, Taxonomy

Abstract

The genus Bournea Oliv., established in 1893 and comprising two morphologically very similar species with actinomorphic flowers, was included in Oreocharis Benth. in 2011, essentially based on molecular data. However, a recent publication has suggested that Bournea should be maintained as a genus distinct from Oreocharis, based on morphological, palynological and DNA sequence data. By contrast, in another recent publication also based on DNA sequences, Bournea is placed within Oreocharis. The morphological, palynological and published molecular phylogenetic data are discussed here. The conclusion is that the overall evidence available is insufficient to support an independent genus, Bournea.

An image of the first page of the paper

Downloads

Published

2025-03-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles